Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Circuits, Inc. v. Dubno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

January 16, 1990

CIRCUITS, INC.
v.
Orest T. DUBNO, Commissioner of Revenue Services.

Argued Dec. 6, 1989.

Page 458

Dennis L. Kern, New Britain, for appellant (plaintiff).

Robert L. Klein, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, was Clarine Nardi Riddle, Atty. Gen., for appellee (defendant).

Before PETERS, C.J., and SHEA, CALLAHAN, GLASS and COVELLO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The Connecticut corporation business tax, General Statutes § 12-217(a), allows taxpayers a deduction for "all items deductible under the federal corporation net income tax law effective and in force on the last day of the income year." [1] The issue in this [213 Conn. 443] case is whether the plaintiff, Circuits, Inc. (taxpayer), is entitled to this state tax deduction for wages as to which, in lieu of a federal tax deduction, it has elected to take a federal new jobs tax credit under § 44B of the Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C. § 44B. [2] The defendant, Orest T. Dubno, commissioner of revenue services (commissioner), upon review of the plaintiff's Connecticut corporation business tax returns for the years 1977 and 1978, disallowed the taxpayer's deduction of such wages. In accordance with General Statutes § 12-237, [3] the taxpayer appealed to the trial court. After a hearing, the trial court found in favor of the commissioner and dismissed the taxpayer's appeal. We transferred the taxpayer's further appeal to this court, pursuant to Practice Book § 4023. We find no error.

The facts are stipulated. The taxpayer paid wages to a number of employees during the relevant tax periods. The commissioner disallowed a state tax deduction only with respect to the wages for which the plaintiff had claimed a federal new jobs tax credit. Neither the scope of the federal tax credit, nor its amount, was contested. Finally, there is no claim of any improper or excessive allocation of wages paid to the class of those eligible for the federal tax credit; all of the disallowed wages were wages for which the taxpayer in fact took a federal tax credit.

[213 Conn. 444] The sole issue stipulated for the trial court was "[w]hether the plaintiff, Circuits, Inc., is entitled to a deduction from gross income for wages paid to employees for the tax periods ending December 31, 1977 and December 31, 1978 under Section 12-217 of the Connecticut General Statutes when it has elected to take these wages as a credit under Section 44-B of the United States Internal Revenue Code." The trial court, relying on Skaarup Shipping Corporation v. Commissioner, 199 Conn. 346, 507 A.2d 988 (1986), ruled that no deduction was available.

On appeal, the taxpayer raises the same issue as was stipulated at trial in slightly different words. We agree with the trial court that our decision in Skaarup is dispositive. Skaarup concerned a taxpayer who had elected to take a federal tax credit for its foreign taxes, and hence was precluded by federal tax law from simultaneously taking a federal tax deduction. We concluded that such a taxpayer was also precluded from claiming a state tax deduction under § 12-217(a). Id., at 351-53, 507 A.2d 988.

Page 459

The federal tax law treats, in essentially parallel fashion, the payment of foreign taxes eligible for a federal tax credit, which we discussed in Skaarup, and the payment of wages eligible for a new jobs tax credit, which are involved in this case. In both situations, under federal law, an election to take a federal tax credit precludes a taxpayer from claiming a federal tax deduction for the same item. Of specific relevance for present purposes is § 280C of the Internal Revenue Code; 26 U.S.C. § 280C; which provides that "[n]o deduction shall be allowed for that portion of the wages or salaries paid ... for the taxable year which is equal to the amount of the credit allowable under [Section [213 Conn. 445] 44B]." [4] Accordingly, once a taxpayer has elected to avail itself of the applicable federal tax credit, neither the foreign taxes in ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.