Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gilly v. Ocwen

United States District Court, D. Connecticut

March 7, 2016

OCWEN, Defendant.


Jeffrey Alker Meyer United States District Judge.

On February 8, 2016, a purported judgment issued by the ''Federal Postal Court'' was filed for registration with the Clerk of Court in the above-captioned matter. Dozens of similar purported judgments of the ''Federal Postal Court'' have been filed for registration in the District of Connecticut in recent weeks. Because further inquiry confirms that the ''Federal Postal Court'' is not a court with authority to have its judgments registered in a federal court, the registration of judgment will be stricken.


On February 8, 2016, a certification for registration of judgment was filed in the name of '':Leighton-Lionel: Ward'' [sic], who is identified as clerk of court for the ''Federal Postal Court'' and with a mailing address to a post office box in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. The purported judgment is in the matter of a plaintiff named '':Penny-Lee Gilly:'' [sic] against a defendant named ''OCWEN, '' and in the principal amount of $11, 509, 456.

The cover page of the filing in this case is on a pre-printed federal court form (AO 451 -Clerk’s Certification of a Judgment to Be Registered in Another District). The filing also includes an attachment entitled, ''Certified Copy of Final Judgment, Translation of Final Default Judgement '' [sic] that states in part:

This document is to serve as a translation summary of the Final Default Judgment by the Federal Postal Court. The original language of the Final Default Judgment was written in Correct Sentence Structure Communication Parse Syntax Grammar. The language has been translated to English pursuant to the Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act.

Doc. #1 at 2. The defendant ''OCWEN'' appears to be Ocwen Financial Corporation (Ocwen), a provider of residential and commercial mortgage loan servicing. The judgment orders Ocwen to pay plaintiff $11, 509, 456, to ''delete'' the outstanding balance on a Deed of Trust created April 18, 2006, to transfer title of the Deed of Trust property to plaintiff, and to notify the Federal Postal Court Clerk when the terms of the judgment have been fulfilled. Except for a photocopy of certified mail sent to defendant, the rest of the filing is a largely unintelligible jumble of codelike numbers, letters, and legalistic terms with little apparent connection to one another.

Because of doubts about the validity of the ''Federal Postal Court, '' I entered an order to show cause for a hearing to learn more about the judgment and the ''Federal Postal Court.'' Notice of the hearing was transmitted to plaintiff, but she did not communicate with the Court. Two individuals ended up participating in the hearing by telephone from an Arizona telephone number. They identified themselves as David Wynn Miller, who described himself as a judge of the ''Federal Postal Court, '' and Leighton Ward, who described himself as clerk of the ''Federal Postal Court.'' These two names appear on the registration documents filed with the Court.

Miller told me that Benjamin Franklin opened the ''Federal Postal Court'' on July 4, 1775. But the court was soon closed in 1776 with the onset of the Revolutionary War. It remained closed for more than two centuries. Then, according to Miller, he and a colleague reopened the court for operation on December 21, 2012 (a day that is otherwise well known as the predicted end of the world according to the Mayan Calendar).

Miller explained to me that the ''Federal Postal Court'' operates on the basis of a sophisticated mathematical understanding of language that proves that certain mortgage documents are fraudulent. According to Miller, the ''Federal Postal Court has been recognized by the United Nations. The ''Federal Postal Court'' does not have a courthouse or other fixed location; instead, it has transitory jurisdiction with a presence wherever the federal postal eagle symbol may be.

A YouTube search discloses numerous videos of Miller and others explaining the operation of the ''Federal Postal Court.''[1] A Westlaw search does not disclose any valid judgments or other proceedings involving the ''Federal Postal Court.'' A Westlaw search for the name of ''David Wynn Miller'' otherwise reflects a lengthy history of frivolous filings that use the same impenetrable language that appears in the filings in this case. See, e.g., United States v. Pflum, 2013 WL 4482706 (D. Kan. 2013) (collecting dozens of cases and noting that several district courts have imposed pre-filing screening orders to prevent Miller from filing suits in these courts without prior leave of the court).


Federal law provides for the registration of certain court judgments in the federal courts of the United States:

A judgment in an action for the recovery of money or property entered in any court of appeals, district court, bankruptcy court, or in the Court of International Trade may be registered by filing a certified copy of the judgment in any other district . . . when the judgment has become final. . . . A judgment so registered shall have the same effect as a ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.